HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)
What Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display9.8
4.4Memory & storage2.6
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Panel typeOLED vs Mini-LED
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 24 GB3×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 10,4962.3×
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 99 Wh+19%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 38.5 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 16,879 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | — |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,492 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,115 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,925 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.68 kg | — |
| Thickness | 23 mm | — |
| Width | 357 mm | — |
| Depth | 269 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 61.1 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.5 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5080 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.09.0
vsAcer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.29.0vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)9.08.8
vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.19.0
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.18.0