vs
3.8Memory & storage3.7
2.5Battery & portability2.4
6.0Features & cooling7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)Focus 17 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) | Focus 17 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 278 mm | 265 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 402 mm | −4 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 29 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.8 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Focus 17 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 73 Wh+14%
- Thickness28 mm vs 29 mm+4%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Focus 17 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- CPU cores6 vs 244×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Weight2.95 kg vs 2.79 kg+6%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.6 GHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 16,746 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 73 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | 2.79 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 29 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 402 mm |
| Depth | 278 mm | 265 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52.5 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)7.37.2
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.1
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.0
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)7.67.2

