vs
3.8Memory & storage3.4
Why is Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)?
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025): No
- Screen size17.3″ vs 16″+8%
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025) better than Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 99 Wh+19%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 7,680+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 16,746 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | — |
| Thickness | 28 mm | — |
| Width | 398 mm | — |
| Depth | 278 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52.5 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAlienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)7.37.2vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.1vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.0
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)7.67.2vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.25.4