vs
7.6Display9.2
3.8Memory & storage3.7
Why is Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 80 Wh+4%
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Screen size17.3″ vs 16″+8%
Why is Erazer Major 16 X1 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- CPU cores6 vs 244×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 16,746 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | — |
| Thickness | 28 mm | — |
| Width | 398 mm | — |
| Depth | 278 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52.5 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsAlienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)7.37.2vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.1vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.0
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)7.67.2