vs
3.6Memory & storage4.3
2.5Battery & portability2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)
| Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) | Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 278 mm | 275 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 396 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 31 mm | −3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 53 Wh+57%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,328+38%
- Thickness28 mm vs 31 mm+11%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Why is Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- CPU cores6 vs 10+67%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.2 GHz+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 16,746 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core 7 240H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 10 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 53 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | — |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 31 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 396 mm |
| Depth | 278 mm | 275 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52.5 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2026)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)8.47.1vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)7.17.0
vsHP Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)6.87.1
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2026)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)8.17.1vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)7.17.2vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.17.1