vs
9.7Display7.6
2.6Memory & storage3.6
3.7Battery & portability2.5
7.2Features & cooling6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026) | Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 278 mm | −9 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 398 mm | −40 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 28 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 3 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026) better than Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Video memory24 GB vs 8 GB3×
- CPU cores24 vs 64×
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 4,6082.3×
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Weight2.48 kg vs 2.95 kg+19%
- Brightness400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
- Thickness26 mm vs 28 mm+8%
- Max CPU clock5.5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+15%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)?
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 83 Wh+19%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 115 W |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 16,746 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 24 | 6 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 7 ms |
| Pixel density | — | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 280 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.48 kg | 2.95 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 278 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 52.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.37.1
vsAcer Nitro 16 AN16-A91 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.07.1vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)7.17.2
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.27.1
vsLenovo LOQ 15AHP11 RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.17.1
vsMSI Cyborg 15 Max RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.67.1