vs
3.4Memory & storage3.2
2.4Battery & portability8.4
3.2Features & cooling3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 3050 (2025)
| Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025) | LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 3050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 278 mm | 236 mm | +42 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 359.2 mm | +38.8 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 22.9 mm | +5.1 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 1.8 kg | +1.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025) better than LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 3050 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 58 Wh+44%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,0482.2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 8 GB4×
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Max CPU clock5.1 GHz vs 4.5 GHz+13%
- Screen size17.3″ vs 15.6″+11%
Why is LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 3050 (2025) better than Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)?
- Weight2.95 kg vs 1.8 kg+64%
- Thickness28 mm vs 22.9 mm+22%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 65 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | — | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 6.1 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 4,430 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 8845HS | Ryzen 5 7535HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Ryzen 5 7535HS, Ryzen 5 150, Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 7 170 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 8,075 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 1,947 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 600 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 27 ms |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | No |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 4,800 MHz |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 58 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 135 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | 1.8 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 22.9 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 359.2 mm |
| Depth | 278 mm | 236 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)3.64.1
vs
Medion Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)4.04.1
vs
MSI VenturePro A17 AI+ A3H RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)4.04.1
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)4.14.1
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender P15 RTX 5060 (2025)4.13.6
vs
Medion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)3.64.1

