vs
3.4Memory & storage2.9
2.4Battery & portability2.5
3.2Features & cooling6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)
| Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025) | Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 278 mm | 278 mm | = |
| Width | 398 mm | 398 mm | = |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 28 mm | = |
| Weight | 3 kg | 3 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025) better than Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,560+80%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
Why is Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)?
Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | — | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 4.5 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 5,046 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 8845HS | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Ryzen AI 5 340, Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 7 ms |
| Pixel density | — | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | 2.95 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 398 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 278 mm | 278 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 52.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)3.64.1
vsMedion Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)4.04.1
vsMSI VenturePro A17 AI+ A3H RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)4.04.1
vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)4.14.1vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Defender P15 RTX 5060 (2025)4.13.6
vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)3.64.1