vs
6.3Memory & storage2.6
2.4Battery & portability4.0
6.5Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
| Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024) | Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 277.9 mm | 272 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Width | 397.5 mm | 383 mm | +14.5 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 33 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.9 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Thickness30 mm vs 33 mm+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) better than Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 7,4242.9×
- CPU cores6 vs 244×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 100 Wh+20%
- Video memory6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Weight2.95 kg vs 2.86 kg+3%
- SD card readerNo · Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock5 GHz vs 5.6 GHz+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 6.4 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,599 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS | Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,027 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,856 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 769 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | 2.86 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 33 mm |
| Width | 397.5 mm | 383 mm |
| Depth | 277.9 mm | 272 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Thin 15 B13 RTX 3050 (2024)4.74.6
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)4.74.7
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024)4.74.8
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)6.34.7
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024)4.74.6
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)7.64.7

