vs
3.0Graphics4.1
4.7Overall performance3.5
5.1Display6.2
6.3Memory & storage2.9
2.4Battery & portability5.6
6.5Features & cooling5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)
| Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024) | LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 277.9 mm | 259 mm | +18.9 mm |
| Width | 397.5 mm | 360 mm | +37.5 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 24 mm | +6 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024) better than LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 512 GB8×
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 60 Wh+38%
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 24 GB+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+17%
- Screen size17.3″ vs 15.6″+11%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)6.4 TFLOPS vs 11.7 TFLOPS+83%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light5,599 vs 8,119+45%
- Weight2.95 kg vs 2.38 kg+24%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 24 GB3×
- Thickness30 mm vs 24 mm+25%
- Pixel density127 ppi vs 141 ppi+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 105 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 6.4 TFLOPS | 11.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,599 | 8,119 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 6 | 6 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,027 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,856 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 769 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 78% |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 24 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 170 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | 2.38 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 397.5 mm | 360 mm |
| Depth | 277.9 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Thin 15 B13 RTX 3050 (2024)4.74.6
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024)4.74.8
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)6.34.7
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024)4.74.6
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)7.64.7
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)vsLenovo LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)4.77.0
