vs
3.0Graphics6.5
4.7Overall performance6.4
5.1Display5.1
6.3Memory & storage6.3
2.4Battery & portability2.4
6.5Features & cooling6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024) | Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 277.9 mm | 277.9 mm | = |
| Width | 397.5 mm | 397.5 mm | = |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 30 mm | = |
| Weight | 3 kg | 3 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024)?
Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Omen 17 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)6.4 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS2.5×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light5,599 vs 11,179+100%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 140 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 6.4 TFLOPS | 16 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,599 | 11,179 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 5 8645HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 6 | 6 |
| CPU threads | 12 | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,027 | 12,027 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,856 | 2,856 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 769 | 769 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 7 ms |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.95 kg | 2.95 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 397.5 mm | 397.5 mm |
| Depth | 277.9 mm | 277.9 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Thin 15 B13 RTX 3050 (2024)4.74.6vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G9 RTX 4050 (2024)4.74.7vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024)4.74.8
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)6.34.7vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Katana A17 AI B8V RTX 4060 (2024)4.74.6
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4050 (2024)7.64.7