vs
5.6Display8.8
5.1Memory & storage2.8
6.6Battery & portability2.1
8.4Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025)Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025) | Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 265 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 357.5 mm | 402 mm | −44.5 mm |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | 29 mm | −6.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025) better than Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Weight2.42 kg vs 2.8 kg+16%
- Thickness22.7 mm vs 29 mm+28%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025)?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 73 Wh+4%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SD card readerNo · Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+10%
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 7.7 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 6,560 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 5 225H | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 14 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 5 225H, Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,432 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,779 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,021 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 73 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.42 kg | 2.8 kg |
| Thickness | 22.7 mm | 29 mm |
| Width | 357.5 mm | 402 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 265 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 17 B13W RTX 5060 (2025)6.06.0vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)6.06.0vs
HP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Eagle GL6J RTX 4050 (2026)6.06.0
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)
vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vs
XMG Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsXMG Apex 16 RTX 5070 (2026)5.98.6