vs
7.7Battery & portability2.1
5.4Features & cooling2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023)
| Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023) | Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 259 mm | 265 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 397 mm | −28 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 31 mm | −7 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 54 Wh+54%
- Weight2.36 kg vs 2.8 kg+19%
- Thickness24 mm vs 31 mm+29%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 2,560+20%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Why is Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Screen size16.1″ vs 17.3″+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 145 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,614 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7840HS | — |
| CPU maker | AMD | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Ryzen 7 7840HS | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | — |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 250 nits | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 137 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | — |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | — |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.36 kg | 2.8 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 31 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 397 mm |
| Depth | 259 mm | 265 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 58.3 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)6.17.6vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.15.4vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)6.26.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)6.16.1vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2024)6.16.7