vs
2.8Memory & storage2.2
7.7Battery & portability6.4
Why is Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023) better than IdeaPad Gaming 3 16 RTX 3060 (2022)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 71 Wh+17%
- Weight2.36 kg vs 2.5 kg+6%
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- HDMI 2.1Yes · IdeaPad Gaming 3 16 RTX 3060 (2022): No
- Max CPU clock5.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz+16%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is IdeaPad Gaming 3 16 RTX 3060 (2022) better than Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Brightness250 nits vs 500 nits2×
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 3,840+25%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Thickness24 mm vs 21 mm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 145 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 3,840 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,614 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Core i5-12450H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-14700HX, Ryzen 7 7840HS | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 250 nits | 500 nits |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 137 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 71 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.36 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 21 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | — |
| Depth | 259 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 58.3 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.0 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.35.3
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)6.16.3vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2024)6.36.7vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)6.37.5
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 3070 (2022)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)5.76.3vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2024)6.37.0