vs
3.3Display8.8
2.9Memory & storage2.1
7.7Battery & portability6.5
Why is Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023) better than IdeaPad Gaming 3 16 RTX 3050 Ti (2022)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 71 Wh+17%
- Weight2.36 kg vs 2.5 kg+6%
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- HDMI 2.1Yes · IdeaPad Gaming 3 16 RTX 3050 Ti (2022): No
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 2,560+20%
- Max CPU clock5.1 GHz vs 4.5 GHz+13%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is IdeaPad Gaming 3 16 RTX 3050 Ti (2022) better than Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Brightness250 nits vs 500 nits2×
- Thickness24 mm vs 21 mm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 145 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,614 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Ryzen 5 6600H |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Ryzen 7 7840HS | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 250 nits | 500 nits |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 137 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 71 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.36 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 21 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | — |
| Depth | 259 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 58.3 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.0 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)6.17.6vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.15.4vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)6.16.0
vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)6.26.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)6.16.1vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2024)6.16.7