vs
2.2Memory & storage7.4
7.3Battery & portability2.1
7.6Features & cooling4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024)
| Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) | Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 259 mm | 273 mm | −14 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 398 mm | −29 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 25.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 54 Wh+55%
- CPU cores16 vs 82×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024): No
- Weight2.39 kg vs 2.7 kg+13%
- Response time3 ms vs 26 ms8.7×
- SD card readerYes · Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Thickness24 mm vs 25.2 mm+5%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Max CPU clock5.3 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+4%
Why is Katana A17 AI RTX 4050 (2024) better than Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 64 GB4×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Video memory4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 2,560+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Screen size16.1″ vs 17.3″+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 105 W |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 11.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 8,387 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 8 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 13,581 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,703 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 968 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 59% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 26 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 40% |
| Pixel density | — | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.39 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 25.2 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 259 mm | 273 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 59.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.35.3
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.15.3
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.85.3
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.25.3
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.3
vs
MSI Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.85.3

