vs
2.2Memory & storage9.3
7.3Battery & portability5.8
7.6Features & cooling5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 3050 (2024)
| Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) | LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 3050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 259 mm | 258.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 359.9 mm | +9.1 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.4 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) better than LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 3050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity83 Wh vs 60 Wh+38%
- CPU cores16 vs 82×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 3050 (2024): No
- Response time3 ms vs 32 ms10.7×
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- SD card readerYes · LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 3050 (2024): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock5.3 GHz vs 4.4 GHz+20%
- Screen size16.1″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 3050 (2024) better than Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 64 GB4×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB8.2×
- Video memory4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 95 W |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 7.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 5,072 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 8940HX | Core i5-12450H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 8 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-12450H, Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14700HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 9,463 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,209 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 593 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16.1″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 32 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 74% |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 8,192 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 83 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.39 kg | 2.38 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23.9 mm |
| Width | 369 mm | 359.9 mm |
| Depth | 259 mm | 258.7 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 48 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.65.4
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.35.4
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.75.4
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.25.4
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)3.85.4
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)5.44.1

