vs
7.2Display4.4
3.2Memory & storage2.4
5.6Battery & portability5.0
5.3Features & cooling2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)LOQ 15 G10 RTX 4050 (2025)
| Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026) | LOQ 15 G10 RTX 4050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 253 mm | 259 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 343 mm | 360 mm | −17 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 24 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.4 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026) better than LOQ 15 G10 RTX 4050 (2025)?
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 60 Wh+17%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,560+80%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Max CPU clock5.1 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+6%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is LOQ 15 G10 RTX 4050 (2025) better than Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)?
LOQ 15 G10 RTX 4050 (2025) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,978 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 8745HX | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14450HX, Core i5-14500HX, Core 5 210H, Core Ultra 5 225H, Ryzen 5 240, Core Ultra 5 235HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core 7 240H, Core Ultra 7 255H, Ryzen 7 260, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 7 356H, Core i9-14900HX, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 386H, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.3″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 6 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 197 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | 170 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.42 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 343 mm | 360 mm |
| Depth | 253 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52.2 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.37.6vs
HP Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)7.36.3vs
HP Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)7.37.0vs
HP Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Cyborg 15 Max C2W RTX 5070 (2026)7.37.0vs
HP Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Katana 15 HX C14W RTX 5060 (2026)7.36.9vs
HP Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)vsLenovo LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026)7.37.6