NewMSI Katana 15 HX C14W RTX 5060 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026) vs LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026)

HP Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026) vs Lenovo LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026)

What Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026) does better (7) and where LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026) wins (7) — every spec side by side.

HP Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)
7.3Score
7 advantages≈ $1,750
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026)
7.6Score
7 advantages
Higher score
7.8Graphics6.7
7.4Overall performance6.4
7.2Display7.0
3.2Memory & storage5.1
5.6Battery & portability7.9
5.3Features & cooling7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026)
343 × 25324344.9 × 254.823.2
Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026)Difference
Depth253 mm254.8 mm−1.8 mm
Width343 mm344.9 mm−1.9 mm
Thickness24 mm23.2 mm+0.8 mm
Weight2.4 kg2.1 kg+0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026) better than LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026)?

  1. GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+42%
  2. Battery capacity70 Wh vs 60 Wh+17%
  3. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,978 vs 12,049+24%
  4. GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,328+38%
  5. Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  6. Pixel density197 ppi vs 148 ppi+33%
  7. Max CPU clock5.1 GHz vs 4.7 GHz+9%

Why is LOQ 15IPH11 RTX 5060 (2026) better than Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)?

  1. RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
  2. SSD (up to)512 GB vs 2,048 GB4×
  3. Thunderbolt or USB4No · Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026): Yes
  4. Weight2.42 kg vs 2.1 kg+15%
  5. Thickness24 mm vs 23.2 mm+3%
  6. USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
  7. Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5070 LaptopGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)115 W115 W
Video memory8 GB8 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
GPU shader cores4,6083,328
GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS18.4 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,97812,049
Processor
ProcessorRyzen 7 8745HXCore Ultra 7 355
CPU makerAMDIntel
CPU cores88
CPU threads—8
Max CPU clock5.1 GHz4.7 GHz
Processor optionsCore i5-14450HX, Core i5-14500HX, Core 5 210H, Core Ultra 5 225H, Ryzen 5 240, Core Ultra 5 235HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core 7 240H, Core Ultra 7 255H, Ryzen 7 260, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 7 356H, Core i9-14900HX, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 386H, Core Ultra 9 290HX PlusCore Ultra 7 355, Core Ultra 7 356H
Geekbench 6 multi-core—11,489
Geekbench 6 single-core—2,757
Cinebench 2024 multi-core—760
Display
Screen size15.3″15.3″
Resolution1920 × 12001920 × 1200
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate165 Hz165 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness300 nits300 nits
sRGB coverage100%100%
Response time6 ms—
Pixel density197 ppi148 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesYes
Advanced OptimusYesYes
MUX switchYesYes
HDRNoNo
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)16 GB32 GB
RAM (base)16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed—5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM64 GB32 GB
RAM slots22
Upgradable RAMYesYes
SSD (up to)512 GB2,048 GB
SSD (base)512 GB512 GB
M.2 SSD slots22
SSD interfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity70 Wh60 Wh
Power adapter150 W245 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
USB-C charging power—100 W
Design & cooling
Weight2.42 kg2.1 kg
Thickness24 mm23.2 mm
Width343 mm344.9 mm
Depth253 mm254.8 mm
Body materialPlasticPlastic
ColoursBlackGray, Green
Cooling fans22
Vapor chamber coolingNoNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Fan noise (max. load)52.2 dB—
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4—Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4NoYes
USB-C ports11
USB-A ports23
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet1 Gbit/s—
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerNoNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.3
Keyboard & camera
Keyboard backlight—Zone RGB
Per-key RGB—No
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadYesYes
Key travel—1.6 mm
Webcam1,080p1,440p
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers2 speakers2.0
Dolby AtmosNoNo
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare