vs
7.8Display8.1
2.6Memory & storage3.6
8.6Battery & portability3.7
4.7Features & cooling3.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)Legion Pro 5 16 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025) | Legion Pro 5 16 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 263 mm | 260 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 363 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 27 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.5 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Legion Pro 5 16 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 3,0722.5×
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.5 kg+14%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion Pro 5 16 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Thickness23 mm vs 27 mm+17%
- Max CPU clock5.2 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+8%
Why is Legion Pro 5 16 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 80 Wh+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 140 W |
| Video memory | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 16 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 11,206 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 10 | 10 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i9-14900HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 69% |
| Pixel density | — | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | 300 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 363 mm |
| Depth | 263 mm | 260 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 56.6 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 4 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)6.76.9
vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.46.7
vsMSI Cyborg 15 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.86.7
vsMSI VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.96.7
vsAcer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5080 (2025)6.66.7