vs
8.1Display4.2
4.0Memory & storage2.4
8.6Battery & portability2.6
4.8Features & cooling2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 263 mm | 267 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 397 mm | −39 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 25 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 49 Wh+55%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.44 kg+11%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 4,608+28%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Thickness23 mm vs 25 mm+9%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | — | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 4,608 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 7 240H | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 49 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.44 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 397 mm |
| Depth | 263 mm | 267 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.37.4
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.57.4
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.67.4
vs
Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.57.4
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.47.4
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.1

