Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (3) and where Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display8.1
2.4Memory & storage4.0
8.5Battery & portability8.6
7.5Features & cooling4.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025) | Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 263 mm | +6 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 358 mm | −4 mm |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 23 mm | +4 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 76 Wh+18%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Why is Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Thickness27 mm vs 23 mm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-14650HX | Core 7 240H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| Aspect ratio | — | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 150 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 27 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 358 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 263 mm |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)7.37.1
vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)7.27.1
vsAlienware Aurora 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.67.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming F15 TUF507 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5070 (2025)7.77.1vs
Alienware Aurora 16 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.37.4