vs
2.6Memory & storage2.7
8.6Battery & portability8.3
4.9Features & cooling2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025)Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026)
| Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025) | Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 263 mm | 249 mm | +14 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 359 mm | −1 mm |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 23 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025) better than Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 60 Wh+27%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+7%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026) better than Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025)?
- Weight2.2 kg vs 1.98 kg+11%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Keyboard backlightSingle-colour RGB vs Zone RGB
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13620H | Core i5-13420H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 150 W | 150 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.98 kg |
| Thickness | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 358 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 263 mm | 249 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | Zone RGB |
| Per-key RGB | — | No |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025)6.46.3vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 15 B2 RTX 5060 (2025)6.36.6
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025)6.36.3
vsMSI Cyborg A15 AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025)6.26.3
vs
Asus TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)vsMSI Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026)5.55.4
vsHP Omen 15 RTX 5050 (2026)vsMSI Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026)5.95.4