Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023) vs HP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (13) and where Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Graphics8.4
7.1Overall performance9.1
8.9Display4.7
6.1Memory & storage6.4
8.1Battery & portability7.3
7.4Features & cooling5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023)Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023) | Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 223.3 mm | 269 mm | −45.7 mm |
| Width | 321.8 mm | 356.6 mm | −34.8 mm |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 19.8 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 2.1 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)48 GB vs 32 GB+50%
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Weight1.6 kg vs 2.09 kg+31%
- Response time1 ms vs 7 ms7×
- Brightness550 nits vs 400 nits+38%
- HDRYes · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- SD card readerYes · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Thickness17.9 mm vs 19.8 mm+11%
- Pixel density234 ppi vs 142 ppi+65%
- Max. supported RAM48 GB vs 32 GB+50%
Why is Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- GPU power (TGP)90 W vs 130 W+44%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 97 Wh+28%
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core698 vs 1,317+89%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,440 vs 13,037+25%
- GPU compute (FP32)17 TFLOPS vs 21.2 TFLOPS+25%
- SSD (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
- CPU threads20 vs 24+20%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 90 W | 130 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 17 TFLOPS | 21.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,440 | 13,037 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900H | Core i7-13700HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900H | Core i7-13700HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 14,415 | 14,310 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,578 | 2,578 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 698 | 1,317 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14.5″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 550 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 234 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 48 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 48 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 1 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 97 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 2.09 kg |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 19.8 mm |
| Width | 321.8 mm | 356.6 mm |
| Depth | 223.3 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 48.8 dB | 47 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.2vs
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023)vsRazer Blade 15 RTX 4070 (2023)8.28.1vs
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAlienware X16 RTX 4070 (2023)8.28.0vs
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404 RTX 4070 (2023)vsSamsung Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023)8.28.4
vs
HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)5.68.3vsAsus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.3