Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Razer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)
What VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (11) and where Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Graphics6.4
8.9Overall performance8.5
9.1Display8.8
6.7Memory & storage8.6
9.6Battery & portability9.2
8.9Features & cooling9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)
| VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023) | Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 249 mm | 244 mm | +5 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 355 mm | = |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 22 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,926 vs 11,133+25%
- GPU compute (FP32)20 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS+25%
- Weight2 kg vs 2.45 kg+23%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,072+50%
- Response time1 ms vs 9 ms9×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core17,875 vs 16,817+6%
- HDRYes · Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core2,100 vs 2,009+5%
- Cooling fans3 vs 2+50%
- Key travel1.4 mm vs 1 mm+40%
Why is Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023) better than VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
- GPU power (TGP)125 W vs 140 W+12%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 95 Wh+6%
- Brightness350 nits vs 500 nits+43%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncNo · VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- IR camera (face login)No · VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Thickness22.9 mm vs 22 mm+4%
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 125 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 20 TFLOPS | 16 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,926 | 11,133 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-13950HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 32 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.6 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-13950HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 17,875 | 16,817 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,823 | 3,014 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 2,100 | 2,009 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 350 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 9 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 98% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 95 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.45 kg |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 22 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 249 mm | 244 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black, Silver | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56.9 dB | 51.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | 1 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)9.49.4vs
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 Gen 8 AMD RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.3vs
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.4vs
Asus VivoBook Pro 16X 3D OLED K6604 RTX 4070 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 8 Intel RTX 4080 (2023)9.49.4
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)8.99.2vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4060 (2023)9.49.2