Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Medion Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (6) and where Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Memory & storage2.2
7.8Battery & portability9.7
4.0Features & cooling4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) | Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 252 mm | 240 mm | +12 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 360 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 23 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 16 GB4×
- SSD (up to)8,000 GB vs 512 GB15.6×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs DDR4
- Max CPU clock4.7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz+12%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Erazer Crawler E25 RTX 3050 (2022) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 93 Wh+3%
- Weight2.27 kg vs 2.2 kg+3%
- Thickness28 mm vs 23 mm+22%
- SD card readerNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 90 W | — |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | — |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.9 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,799 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 170 | Ryzen 5 5600H |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 6 | 6 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 250 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 8,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 93 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 360 mm |
| Depth | 252 mm | 240 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | — |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 15 B13 RTX 5060 (2025)6.06.5vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 17 B13W RTX 5060 (2025)6.06.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.08.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)6.07.8vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2026)6.08.4