pan.tf
Compare
TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) vs HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)

What TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (9) and where Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Asus · 2024TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)

6.0Score

9 advantages≈ $1,000

HP · 2025Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)

7.6Score

13 advantages≈ $1,500

Higher score

4.5Graphics7.6

3.8Overall performance8.2

5.6Display7.5

8.0Memory & storage3.8

7.8Battery & portability4.7

4.0Features & cooling5.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)

	TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)	Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)	Difference
Depth	252 mm	269 mm	−17 mm
Width	355 mm	358 mm	−3 mm
Thickness	28 mm	25 mm	+3 mm
Weight	2.3 kg	2.4 kg	−0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)?

RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
SSD (up to)6,000 GB vs 1,000 GB6×
Battery capacity90 Wh vs 70 Wh+29%
Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
Weight2.27 kg vs 2.43 kg+7%
USB-C ports2 vs 12×
Dolby AtmosYes · Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025): No
sRGB coverage100% vs 62%+61%
Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.6 mm+6%

Why is Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)?

GPU compute (FP32)10.9 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS2.4×
CPU cores6 vs 162.7×
3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,799 vs 13,913+78%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
GPU power (TGP)90 W vs 115 W+28%
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
Advanced OptimusNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
Brightness250 nits vs 300 nits+20%
Thickness28 mm vs 25 mm+12%
USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)≈ $1,0006.0	HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)≈ $1,5007.6
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop	GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	90 W	115 W
Video memory	16 GB	8 GB
Video memory type	GDDR6	GDDR7
GPU shader cores	2,560	4,608
GPU compute (FP32)	10.9 TFLOPS	26.2 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	7,799	13,913
Processor
Processor	Ryzen 7 170	Ryzen 9 8940HX
CPU maker	AMD	AMD
CPU cores	6	16
Max CPU clock	4.7 GHz	5.3 GHz
Processor options	Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX	Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 255H, Core i9-14900HX, Ryzen 9 8940HX
Display
Screen size	16″	16″
Resolution	1920 × 1200	2560 × 1600
Resolution class	Full HD (1080p/1200p)	QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate	144 Hz	240 Hz
Panel type	IPS	IPS
Brightness	250 nits	300 nits
sRGB coverage	100%	62%
Response time	3 ms	3 ms
DCI-P3 coverage	—	40%
Pixel density	142 ppi	142 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
G-Sync / FreeSync	Yes	Yes
Advanced Optimus	No	Yes
MUX switch	Yes	Yes
HDR	No	No
Touchscreen	No	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	64 GB	32 GB
RAM (base)	16 GB	16 GB
RAM type	DDR5	DDR5
RAM speed	5,600 MHz	5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM	32 GB	32 GB
RAM slots	2	2
Upgradable RAM	Yes	Yes
SSD (up to)	6,000 GB	1,000 GB
SSD (base)	512 GB	512 GB
M.2 SSD slots	2	2
SSD interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	90 Wh	70 Wh
Power adapter	240 W	230 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	Yes	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	2.27 kg	2.43 kg
Thickness	28 mm	25 mm
Width	355 mm	358 mm
Depth	252 mm	269 mm
Body material	Aluminium, Plastic	Aluminium, Plastic
Colours	Grey	Black
Cooling fans	2	2
Vapor chamber cooling	No	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	No	No
Fan noise (max. load)	—	52.7 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	—	USB4
Thunderbolt or USB4	No	No
USB-C ports	2	1
USB-A ports	2	3
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	No	No
Ethernet	1 Gbit/s	1 Gbit/s
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	No	No
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	Yes	Yes
Numeric keypad	Yes	Yes
Key travel	1.7 mm	1.6 mm
Webcam	720p	1,080p
IR camera (face login)	No	No
Fingerprint reader	No	No
Audio
Speakers	2 speakers	2 speakers
Dolby Atmos	Yes	No