NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) vs IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)

What TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (19) and where IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023) wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)
6.0Score
19 advantages≈ $1,050
Higher score
vs
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)
5.1Score
2 advantages
4.4Graphics3.8
3.8Overall performance3.5
5.6Display2.3
8.0Memory & storage8.6
7.8Battery & portability7.8
4.0Features & cooling2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)
355 × 25228359.6 × 266.421.8
TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)Difference
Depth252 mm266.4 mm−14.4 mm
Width355 mm359.6 mm−4.6 mm
Thickness28 mm21.8 mm+6.2 mm
Weight2.3 kg2.3 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) better than IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023)?

  1. Video memory16 GB vs 6 GB2.7×
  2. Battery capacity90 Wh vs 71 Wh+27%
  3. MUX switchYes · IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023): No
  4. SSD (up to)8,000 GB vs 4,096 GB+95%
  5. GPU power (TGP)90 W vs 85 W+6%
  6. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  7. Response time3 ms vs 19 ms6.3×
  8. Weight2.27 kg vs 2.32 kg+2%
  9. RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
  10. SSD (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  11. USB-C ports2 vs 12×
  12. HDMI 2.1Yes · IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023): No

Why is IdeaPad Gaming 3 15ARH7 15 7 AMD RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)?

  1. Thickness28 mm vs 21.8 mm+28%
  2. Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 4050 LaptopGeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)90 W85 W
Video memory16 GB6 GB
Video memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
GPU shader cores2,5602,560
GPU compute (FP32)10.9 TFLOPS10.9 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,7997,686
Processor
ProcessorRyzen 7 170Ryzen 5 6600H
CPU makerAMDAMD
CPU cores66
CPU threads—12
Max CPU clock4.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Processor optionsRyzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HXRyzen 5 6600H, Ryzen 5 7535HS, Ryzen 7 6800H, Ryzen 7 7735HS
Geekbench 6 multi-core—8,766
Geekbench 6 single-core—2,010
Cinebench 2024 multi-core—568
Display
Screen size16″15.6″
Resolution1920 × 12001920 × 1080
Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness250 nits250 nits
sRGB coverage100%58%
Response time3 ms19 ms
DCI-P3 coverage—39%
Pixel density142 ppi141 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:9
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesYes
Advanced OptimusNoNo
MUX switchYesNo
HDRNoNo
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)64 GB64 GB
RAM (base)16 GB8 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed5,600 MHz4,800 MHz
Max. supported RAM32 GB64 GB
RAM slots22
Upgradable RAMYesYes
SSD (up to)8,000 GB4,096 GB
SSD (base)512 GB256 GB
M.2 SSD slots22
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity90 Wh71 Wh
Power adapter240 W170 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
Design & cooling
Weight2.27 kg2.32 kg
Thickness28 mm21.8 mm
Width355 mm359.6 mm
Depth252 mm266.4 mm
Body materialAluminium, PlasticPlastic
ColoursGreyWhite, Gray
Cooling fans22
Vapor chamber coolingNoNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Fan noise (max. load)—49.4 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt or USB4NoNo
USB-C ports21
USB-A ports22
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1YesNo
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet1 Gbit/s—
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerNoNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.1
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadYesYes
Key travel1.7 mm1.5 mm
Webcam720p720p
IR camera (face login)NoNo
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers2 speakers2.0
Dolby AtmosYesNo
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare