pan.tf
Compare
TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) vs HP Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)

What TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (9) and where Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026) wins (13) — every spec side by side.

Asus · 2024TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)

6.0Score

9 advantages≈ $1,050

HP · 2026Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)

6.8Score

13 advantages≈ $1,200

Higher score

4.4Graphics6.9

3.8Overall performance6.7

5.6Display7.2

8.0Memory & storage3.5

7.8Battery & portability5.6

4.0Features & cooling5.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)

	TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)	Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)	Difference
Depth	252 mm	253 mm	−1 mm
Width	355 mm	343 mm	+12 mm
Thickness	28 mm	24 mm	+4 mm
Weight	2.3 kg	2.4 kg	−0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)?

RAM (up to)64 GB vs 24 GB2.7×
SSD (up to)8,000 GB vs 1,000 GB8×
Battery capacity90 Wh vs 70 Wh+29%
Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
Weight2.27 kg vs 2.42 kg+7%
Response time3 ms vs 6 ms2.2×
USB-C ports2 vs 12×
Dolby AtmosYes · Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026): No
Screen size16″ vs 15.3″+5%

Why is Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)?

GPU compute (FP32)10.9 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+69%
3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,799 vs 12,497+60%
GPU power (TGP)90 W vs 115 W+28%
CPU cores6 vs 10+67%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,328+30%
Advanced OptimusNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
Brightness250 nits vs 300 nits+20%
Thickness28 mm vs 24 mm+17%
Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
Pixel density142 ppi vs 197 ppi+39%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)≈ $1,0506.0	HP Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)≈ $1,2006.8
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	90 W	115 W
Video memory	16 GB	8 GB
Video memory type	GDDR6	GDDR7
GPU shader cores	2,560	3,328
GPU compute (FP32)	10.9 TFLOPS	18.4 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	7,799	12,497
Processor
Processor	Ryzen 7 170	Ryzen 7 260
CPU maker	AMD	AMD
CPU cores	6	10
Max CPU clock	4.7 GHz	4.8 GHz
Processor options	Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX	Core i5-14450HX, Ryzen 5 240, Core i7-14650HX, Ryzen 7 8745HX, Core 7 240H, Core Ultra 7 255H, Ryzen 7 260
Display
Screen size	16″	15.3″
Resolution	1920 × 1200	1920 × 1200
Resolution class	Full HD (1080p/1200p)	Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate	144 Hz	165 Hz
Panel type	IPS	IPS
Brightness	250 nits	300 nits
sRGB coverage	100%	100%
Response time	3 ms	6 ms
Pixel density	142 ppi	197 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
G-Sync / FreeSync	Yes	Yes
Advanced Optimus	No	Yes
MUX switch	Yes	Yes
HDR	No	No
Touchscreen	No	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	64 GB	24 GB
RAM (base)	16 GB	16 GB
RAM type	DDR5	DDR5
RAM speed	5,600 MHz	5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM	32 GB	64 GB
RAM slots	2	2
Upgradable RAM	Yes	Yes
SSD (up to)	8,000 GB	1,000 GB
SSD (base)	512 GB	512 GB
M.2 SSD slots	2	2
SSD interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 5.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	90 Wh	70 Wh
Power adapter	240 W	150 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	Yes	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	2.27 kg	2.42 kg
Thickness	28 mm	24 mm
Width	355 mm	343 mm
Depth	252 mm	253 mm
Body material	Aluminium, Plastic	Plastic
Colours	Grey	Black
Cooling fans	2	2
Vapor chamber cooling	No	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	No	No
Fan noise (max. load)	—	52.2 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt or USB4	No	No
USB-C ports	2	1
USB-A ports	2	2
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	No	No
Ethernet	1 Gbit/s	1 Gbit/s
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	No	No
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	Yes	Yes
Numeric keypad	Yes	Yes
Key travel	1.7 mm	—
Webcam	720p	1,080p
IR camera (face login)	No	—
Fingerprint reader	No	No
Audio
Speakers	2 speakers	2 speakers
Dolby Atmos	Yes	No