vs
3.3Memory & storage2.2
8.9Battery & portability7.3
7.5Features & cooling7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) | Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 259 mm | +10 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 369 mm | −15 mm |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 24 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,0482.2×
- Video memory8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.39 kg+9%
Why is Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- CPU cores8 vs 162×
- Response time11 ms vs 3 ms3.7×
- SD card readerNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Thickness26 mm vs 24 mm+8%
- Max CPU clock5.1 GHz vs 5.3 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,947 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,288 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,651 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 931 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | — |
| Response time | 11 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.39 kg |
| Thickness | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 369 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.97.6
vsAcer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)8.17.9vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 5 15 RTX 5060 (2025)7.97.9
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)6.07.9
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)8.07.9vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 Slim RTX 5070 (2025)7.97.8