Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) vs MSI VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (14) and where VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Graphics4.4
7.3Overall performance5.1
6.3Display4.4
4.6Memory & storage8.0
7.7Battery & portability8.9
6.1Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) | VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 245.2 mm | +23.8 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359.3 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.9 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) better than VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025)?
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 55 W2.1×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 60 Hz2.8×
- GPU compute (FP32)18.4 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS+69%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,792 vs 9,071+41%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,288 vs 10,695+24%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core931 vs 695+34%
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
- Dolby AtmosYes · VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Why is VenturePro A16 AI+ A3HW RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 75 Wh+7%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 1.9 kg+16%
- IR camera (face login)No · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- Brightness300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- sRGB coverage60% vs 100%+67%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,651 vs 2,813+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 55 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.4 TFLOPS | 10.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,792 | 9,071 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen AI 5 340 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen AI 5 340, Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,288 | 10,695 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,651 | 2,813 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 931 | 695 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 350 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 75 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 90 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.9 kg |
| Thickness | — | 23.1 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 359.3 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 245.2 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Grey | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)7.47.5vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.2vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.2vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)7.49.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)7.46.8