pan.tf
Compare
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) vs HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)

What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (1) and where Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Asus · 2025TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)

7.4Score

1 advantage≈ $1,400

Higher score

HP · 2026Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)

6.8Score

9 advantages≈ $3,200

6.3Display9.0

4.6Memory & storage3.4

7.7Battery & portability3.8

6.1Features & cooling7.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)

	TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)	Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)	Difference
Depth	269 mm	269 mm	=
Width	354 mm	358 mm	−4 mm
Weight	2.2 kg	2.5 kg	−0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?

Weight2.2 kg vs 2.48 kg+13%

Why is Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)?

Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
GPU shader cores3,328 vs 5,888+77%
Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
Brightness300 nits vs 400 nits+33%
RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)≈ $1,4007.4	HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)≈ $3,2006.8
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop	GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	115 W	—
Video memory	8 GB	12 GB
Video memory type	GDDR7	GDDR7
GPU shader cores	3,328	5,888
GPU compute (FP32)	18.4 TFLOPS	—
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	12,792	—
Processor
Processor	Ryzen 7 260	Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
CPU maker	AMD	AMD
CPU cores	8	—
CPU threads	16	—
Max CPU clock	5.1 GHz	—
Processor options	Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX	Ryzen AI 7 450, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, Ryzen AI 9 HX 475
Geekbench 6 multi-core	13,288	—
Geekbench 6 single-core	2,651	—
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	931	—
Display
Screen size	16″	16″
Resolution	1920 × 1200	2560 × 1600
Resolution class	Full HD (1080p/1200p)	QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate	165 Hz	240 Hz
Panel type	IPS	IPS
Brightness	300 nits	400 nits
sRGB coverage	60%	—
Response time	3 ms	—
DCI-P3 coverage	40%	—
Pixel density	142 ppi	—
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
G-Sync / FreeSync	Yes	—
Advanced Optimus	No	—
MUX switch	Yes	—
HDR	No	—
Touchscreen	No	—
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	32 GB	32 GB
RAM (base)	16 GB	32 GB
RAM type	DDR5	DDR5
RAM speed	5,600 MHz	5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM	64 GB	—
RAM slots	2	—
Upgradable RAM	Yes	—
SSD (up to)	1,000 GB	1,000 GB
SSD (base)	512 GB	1,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots	2	—
SSD interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	—
Battery & power
Battery capacity	70 Wh	70 Wh
Power adapter	200 W	280 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	Yes	Yes
USB-C charging power	100 W	—
Design & cooling
Weight	2.2 kg	2.48 kg
Thickness	—	26 mm
Width	354 mm	358 mm
Depth	269 mm	269 mm
Body material	Aluminium, Plastic	—
Colours	Grey	Black
Cooling fans	2	—
Vapor chamber cooling	No	—
Liquid metal (CPU)	No	—
Fan noise (max. load)	39.4 dB	—
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt or USB4	No	No
USB-C ports	2	—
USB-A ports	2	—
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	No	—
Ethernet	—	1 Gbit/s
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	No	—
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	6
Keyboard & camera
Keyboard backlight	Single-colour RGB	—
Backlit keyboard	Yes	Yes
Numeric keypad	Yes	—
Key travel	1.7 mm	—
Webcam	1,080p	—
IR camera (face login)	No	—
Fingerprint reader	No	—
Audio
Speakers	—	2 speakers
Dolby Atmos	Yes	—