Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Lenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (17) and where Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Graphics4.4
7.3Overall performance4.3
6.3Display8.5
4.6Memory & storage5.6
7.7Battery & portability9.4
6.1Features & cooling6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) | Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 249.1 mm | +19.9 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 327.5 mm | +26.5 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.8 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,792 vs 7,371+74%
- GPU compute (FP32)18.4 TFLOPS vs 11.7 TFLOPS+57%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,288 vs 10,009+33%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 105 W+10%
- CPU cores8 vs 6+33%
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 2,560+30%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core931 vs 736+26%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023): No
- CPU threads16 vs 12+33%
Why is Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Battery capacity70 Wh vs 74 Wh+5%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 1.75 kg+26%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- DCI-P3 coverage40% vs 100%2.5×
- Brightness300 nits vs 400 nits+33%
- HDRNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- SD card readerNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.4 TFLOPS | 11.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,792 | 7,371 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 6 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 7 7840HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,288 | 10,009 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,651 | 2,425 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 931 | 736 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14.5″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 234 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 74 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 170 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.75 kg |
| Thickness | — | 20.8 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 327.5 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 249.1 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Grey | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | 52.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.6
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)7.47.5
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.2
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.2
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5080 (2025)7.49.6
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)7.46.8

