Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025) does better (9) and where Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Graphics7.7
7.0Overall performance8.3
4.1Display9.7
8.7Memory & storage3.8
8.9Battery & portability4.0
8.6Features & cooling6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025) | Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 268 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 364 mm | −10 mm |
| Thickness | 25.7 mm | 26 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.5 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 80 Wh+12%
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.52 kg+15%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Fan noise (max. load)39.4 dB vs 56 dB+42%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm+13%
Why is Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)14.9 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS+76%
- CPU cores8 vs 162×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,581 vs 14,574+38%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Brightness300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
- Response time11 ms vs 1 ms11×
- DCI-P3 coverage40% vs 100%2.5×
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- HDRNo · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 14.9 TFLOPS | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,581 | 14,574 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,288 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,651 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 931 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | 100% |
| Response time | 11 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,200 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.52 kg |
| Thickness | 25.7 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 364 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 268 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | 56 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)7.68.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsXMG Pro 16 RTX 5060 (2025)8.07.9
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)6.08.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5070 (2025)8.08.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5060 (2025)8.07.8
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)8.08.0