Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025) vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)
What TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025) does better (5) and where TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Graphics7.8
7.0Overall performance7.5
4.1Display7.0
8.7Memory & storage3.3
8.9Battery & portability8.9
8.6Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)
| TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025) | TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 269 mm | 269 mm | = |
| Width | 354 mm | 354 mm | = |
| Thickness | 25.7 mm | 26 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 16 GB4×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Brightness300 nits vs 250 nits+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4070 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 140 W+22%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU compute (FP32)14.9 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+46%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,581 vs 13,427+27%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- CPU cores8 vs 12+50%
- Response time11 ms vs 3 ms3.7×
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- sRGB coverage60% vs 100%+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 14.9 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,581 | 13,427 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 12 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,288 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,651 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 931 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | 100% |
| Response time | 11 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | 40% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,200 MHz | 7,500 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 25.7 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 354 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 269 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 39.4 dB | 39.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)8.08.2
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)7.68.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsXMG Pro 16 RTX 5060 (2025)8.07.9
vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)6.08.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5070 (2025)8.08.0vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5060 (2025)8.07.8