Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) vs Lenovo Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)
What TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) does better (10) and where Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Graphics7.1
6.0Overall performance7.6
6.7Display9.2
8.4Memory & storage4.9
5.3Battery & portability3.9
7.0Features & cooling6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)
| TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) | Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 227 mm | 246 mm | −19 mm |
| Width | 311 mm | 344 mm | −33 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 20 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | 1.9 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Weight1.46 kg vs 1.88 kg+29%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- SD card readerYes · Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026): No
- RAM speed8,533 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+52%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Pixel density216 ppi vs 197 ppi+10%
- Key travel1.7 mm vs 1.6 mm+6%
Why is Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) better than TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Battery capacity73 Wh vs 80 Wh+10%
- GPU power (TGP)105 W vs 115 W+10%
- GPU compute (FP32)14 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+31%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,485 vs 15,924+28%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,869 vs 11,249+27%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core867 vs 1,128+30%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,328+30%
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- Advanced OptimusNo · TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- HDRNo · TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 105 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 14 TFLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,869 | 11,249 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Core Ultra 7 356H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI Max+ 392, Ryzen AI 9 465 | Core i7-13650HX, Ryzen 7 250, Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 251HX, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 7 356H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,485 | 15,924 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,431 | 2,724 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 867 | 1,128 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 15.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 216 ppi | 197 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 8,533 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 73 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 200 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.46 kg | 1.88 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 20 mm |
| Width | 311 mm | 344 mm |
| Depth | 227 mm | 246 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Gray | White |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 51.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.17.7
vsAcer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)6.47.1
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)7.37.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)4.27.1
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)7.37.1vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)7.17.1