Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) does better (18) and where TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Graphics5.1
7.6Overall performance6.0
9.1Display6.7
8.1Memory & storage8.4
3.8Battery & portability5.3
6.6Features & cooling7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) | TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 227 mm | +44.1 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 311 mm | +49.1 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 19.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.5 kg | +0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- CPU cores20 vs 82.5×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,860 vs 8672.1×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,015 vs 12,485+52%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 73 Wh+23%
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Response time1 ms vs 3 ms3×
- Brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- HDRYes · TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Upgradable RAMYes · TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025): No
Why is TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU power (TGP)70 W vs 105 W+50%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.46 kg+58%
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- GPU compute (FP32)10.8 TFLOPS vs 14 TFLOPS+30%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,593 vs 8,869+3%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 8,533 MHz+33%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 216 ppi+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 70 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.8 TFLOPS | 14 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,593 | 8,869 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Ryzen 7 260 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 20 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI Max+ 392, Ryzen AI 9 465 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | 12,485 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | 2,431 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | 867 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 216 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 8,533 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 73 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.46 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 19.9 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 311 mm |
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 227 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Blue | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5060 (2025)7.37.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3 RTX 4070 (2025)7.37.4
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.17.7
vsAcer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)6.47.1vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)7.37.1
vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)4.27.1