Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) vs Lenovo Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)
What ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) does better (14) and where Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Graphics7.6
9.2Overall performance9.2
8.7Display9.0
3.0Memory & storage3.8
6.7Battery & portability6.4
8.2Features & cooling7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)
| ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) | Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 220 mm | 263 mm | −43 mm |
| Width | 311 mm | 362 mm | −51 mm |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 18 mm | = |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 2 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+46%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light17,182 vs 12,525+37%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 3,328+77%
- Weight1.58 kg vs 1.99 kg+26%
- Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Dolby AtmosYes · Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Cooling fans3 vs 2+50%
- RAM speed8,533 MHz vs 6,400 MHz+33%
- Pixel density243 ppi vs 189 ppi+29%
Why is Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?
- Battery capacity73 Wh vs 84 Wh+15%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core16,499 vs 18,468+12%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,230 vs 1,774+44%
- CPU cores16 vs 20+25%
- Upgradable RAMNo · ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026): Yes
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
- CPU threads16 vs 20+25%
- Screen size14″ vs 16″+14%
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 5.2 GHz+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 17,182 | 12,525 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 386H | Core Ultra 7 255HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 20 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 386H | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 16,499 | 18,468 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,763 | 2,919 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,230 | 1,774 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 243 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 8,533 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 73 Wh | 84 Wh |
| Power adapter | 250 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.58 kg | 1.99 kg |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 311 mm | 362 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 263 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Grey | White |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.5 dB | 54.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsLenovo Legion 7a 15 G11 Radeon 8060S (2026)8.78.9
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.68.7vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.79.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 OLED GU606 RTX 5070 (2026)8.79.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsSamsung Galaxy Book 6 Ultra RTX 5070 (2026)8.78.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.79.6