vs
9.7Graphics7.5
9.4Overall performance7.4
9.3Display7.4
5.3Memory & storage3.9
3.6Battery & portability5.4
6.4Features & cooling7.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)G16 RTX 3070 Ti (2022)
| ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) | G16 RTX 3070 Ti (2022) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 266 mm | 272.1 mm | −6.1 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 357.2 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 26.9 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) better than G16 RTX 3070 Ti (2022)?
- GPU compute (FP32)45.2 TFLOPS vs 18.3 TFLOPS2.5×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light26,424 vs 11,9582.2×
- Brightness1,100 nits vs 300 nits3.7×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,038 vs 11,612+64%
- GPU power (TGP)175 W vs 140 W+25%
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,961 vs 1,105+77%
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 5,632+73%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 86 Wh+5%
- Response time3 ms vs 9 ms3×
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 8 GB4×
Why is G16 RTX 3070 Ti (2022) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Weight2.67 kg vs 2.44 kg+9%
- Advanced OptimusNo · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Thickness30 mm vs 26.9 mm+12%
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 2,048 GB+2%
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)56 dB vs 48.1 dB+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 5,632 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 18.3 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 26,424 | 11,958 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i7-12700H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 32 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 9 7945HX | Core i7-12700H, Core i9-12900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,038 | 11,612 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,105 | 2,426 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,961 | 1,105 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 1,100 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 98% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 9 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 68% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 86 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.67 kg | 2.44 kg |
| Thickness | 30 mm | 26.9 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 357.2 mm |
| Depth | 266 mm | 272.1 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56 dB | 48.1 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsAlienware m16 RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Alpha 17 RTX 4060 (2023)8.98.6vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 Gen 8 AMD RTX 4080 (2023)8.99.3vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17X RTX 3080 Ti (2023)8.98.7vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4080 (2023)8.98.6
vsAcer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)8.78.9