- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023) vs ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)
What Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023) does better (9) and where ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Graphics9.7
9.3Overall performance9.4
7.5Display9.3
6.3Memory & storage5.3
3.2Battery & portability3.6
7.4Features & cooling6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023)ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)
| Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023) | ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 280.8 mm | 266 mm | +14.8 mm |
| Width | 359.4 mm | 355 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 30 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.7 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Resolution class4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): No
- CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Thickness27.9 mm vs 30 mm+8%
- Pixel density282 ppi vs 189 ppi+49%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+17%
- Key travel1.8 mm vs 1.7 mm+6%
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023)?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 240 Hz4×
- Brightness500 nits vs 1,100 nits2.2×
- GPU compute (FP32)37.6 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS+20%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light22,701 vs 26,424+16%
- Weight2.98 kg vs 2.67 kg+12%
- Response time28 ms vs 3 ms9.3×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core18,317 vs 19,038+4%
- Video memory12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores7,424 vs 9,728+31%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,424 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 37.6 TFLOPS | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 22,701 | 26,424 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 24 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 32 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 18,317 | 19,038 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,095 | 3,105 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,874 | 1,961 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 4K (2160p/2400p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 1,100 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 28 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 90% | 99% |
| Pixel density | 282 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.98 kg | 2.67 kg |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 359.4 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 280.8 mm | 266 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 56 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 6 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4070 (2023)8.68.3vs
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17 RTX 4080 (2023)8.68.6vs
Acer Predator Helios 3D 15 SpatialLabs Edition RTX 4080 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 RTX 4060 (2023)8.68.7
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)8.78.9vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 RTX 4080 (2023)8.98.8vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 15X RTX 4070 (2023)8.99.1