- pan.tf
- Compare
- ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026) vs Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)
What ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026) does better (8) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.8
7.8Memory & storage2.6
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeOLED vs Mini-LED
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): No
- RAM (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 10,496 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 386H | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| Processor options | — | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 1,100 nits | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 250 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.82 kg | — |
| Thickness | 25 mm | — |
| Width | 355 mm | — |
| Depth | 247 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)vsMSI Katana 15 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)9.47.3
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)9.29.4
vsMSI Crosshair 16 Max HX E2 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)8.39.4
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5080 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)7.69.4
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)8.39.4
vsAcer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)7.39.4