pan.tf
Compare
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026) vs TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026) vs Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)

What ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026) does better (12) and where TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023) wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Asus · 2026ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)

9.4Score

12 advantages≈ $7,100

Higher score

Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)

Asus · 2023TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)

7.4Score

4 advantages≈ $1,600

9.8Display3.5

7.8Memory & storage9.3

4.4Battery & portability6.5

9.8Features & cooling5.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)

	ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)	TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)	Difference
Depth	247 mm	264 mm	−17 mm
Width	355 mm	395 mm	−40 mm
Thickness	25 mm	25 mm	=
Weight	2.8 kg	2.6 kg	+0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026) better than TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)?

Video memory24 GB vs 8 GB3×
GPU shader cores10,496 vs 3,0723.4×
Brightness1,100 nits vs 250 nits4.4×
Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Panel typeOLED vs IPS
RAM (base)64 GB vs 16 GB4×
SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 500 GB4×
RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
SD card readerYes · TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023): No
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Bluetooth6 vs 5.2+15%

Why is TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)?

SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 8,000 GB4×
RAM (up to)64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
Weight2.82 kg vs 2.6 kg+8%
Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 OLED GX651AX RTX 5090 (2026)≈ $7,1009.4	Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)≈ $1,6007.4
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	—	140 W
Video memory	24 GB	8 GB
Video memory type	GDDR7	GDDR6
GPU shader cores	10,496	3,072
GPU compute (FP32)	—	16 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	—	10,820
Processor
Processor	Core Ultra 9 386H	Ryzen 7 7735HS
CPU maker	Intel	AMD
CPU cores	—	8
CPU threads	—	16
Max CPU clock	—	4.8 GHz
Processor options	—	Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS
Geekbench 6 multi-core	—	10,408
Geekbench 6 single-core	—	2,188
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	—	748
Display
Screen size	16″	17.3″
Resolution	2880 × 1800	1920 × 1080
Resolution class	3K (1800p/2000p)	Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate	—	144 Hz
Panel type	OLED	IPS
Brightness	1,100 nits	250 nits
sRGB coverage	—	62%
Response time	—	7 ms
DCI-P3 coverage	—	100%
Pixel density	—	127 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:9
G-Sync / FreeSync	—	Yes
Advanced Optimus	—	No
MUX switch	—	Yes
HDR	—	No
Touchscreen	Yes	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	64 GB	96 GB
RAM (base)	64 GB	16 GB
RAM type	LPDDR5X	DDR5
RAM speed	—	4,800 MHz
Max. supported RAM	—	32 GB
RAM slots	—	2
Upgradable RAM	—	Yes
SSD (up to)	2,000 GB	8,000 GB
SSD (base)	2,000 GB	500 GB
M.2 SSD slots	—	2
SSD interface	—	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	90 Wh	90 Wh
Power adapter	250 W	240 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	2.82 kg	2.6 kg
Thickness	25 mm	25 mm
Width	355 mm	395 mm
Depth	247 mm	264 mm
Body material	—	Aluminium, Plastic
Colours	Grey	Gray
Cooling fans	—	2
Vapor chamber cooling	—	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	—	No
Fan noise (max. load)	—	57.2 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	Thunderbolt 4	USB4
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	Yes
USB-C ports	—	2
USB-A ports	—	2
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	—	No
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	No
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	6	5.2
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	—	Yes
Numeric keypad	—	Yes
Key travel	—	1.7 mm
Webcam	1,080p	720p
IR camera (face login)	—	No
Fingerprint reader	—	No
Audio
Speakers	4 speakers	2 speakers
Dolby Atmos	Yes	Yes