NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs XMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)

What ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (4) and where Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
9.1Score
4 advantages≈ $5,100
Higher score
vs
XMG Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
8.2Score
7 advantages≈ $5,400
9.6Display9.8
5.3Memory & storage4.3
3.1Battery & portability6.0
9.7Features & cooling8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
354 × 26831357 × 26028
ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)Difference
Depth268 mm260 mm+8 mm
Width354 mm357 mm−3 mm
Thickness31 mm28 mm+3 mm
Weight2.8 kg2.6 kg+0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025)?

  1. Brightness1,200 nits vs 500 nits2.4×
  2. Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025): No
  3. CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
  4. Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%

Why is Neo 16 RTX 5090 (2025) better than ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?

  1. Video memory12 GB vs 24 GB2×
  2. Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
  3. GPU shader cores5,888 vs 10,496+78%
  4. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
  5. Weight2.8 kg vs 2.65 kg+6%
  6. SD card readerNo · ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
  7. Thickness31 mm vs 28 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5070 Ti LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)175 W—
Video memory12 GB24 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
GPU shader cores5,88810,496
GPU compute (FP32)37.4 TFLOPS—
3DMark Steel Nomad Light20,161—
Processor
ProcessorCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen 9 9955HX3D
CPU makerIntelAMD
CPU cores2416
Max CPU clock5.4 GHz5.4 GHz
Processor optionsCore Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX—
Display
Screen size16″16″
Resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate240 Hz300 Hz
Panel typeMini-LEDMini-LED
Brightness1,200 nits500 nits
sRGB coverage100%—
Response time3 ms—
DCI-P3 coverage100%—
Pixel density189 ppi—
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
G-Sync / FreeSyncYes—
Advanced OptimusNo—
MUX switchYes—
HDRYes—
TouchscreenNo—
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB32 GB
RAM (base)32 GB32 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed5,600 MHz—
Max. supported RAM64 GB—
RAM slots2—
Upgradable RAMYes—
SSD (up to)2,000 GB2,000 GB
SSD (base)2,000 GB2,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots2—
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4—
Battery & power
Battery capacity90 Wh100 Wh
Power adapter380 W330 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
USB-C charging power100 W—
Design & cooling
Weight2.8 kg2.65 kg
Thickness31 mm28 mm
Width354 mm357 mm
Depth268 mm260 mm
Body materialAluminium, Plastic—
ColoursBlackBlack
Cooling fans3—
Vapor chamber coolingYes—
Liquid metal (CPU)No—
Fan noise (max. load)57.2 dB—
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 5—
Thunderbolt or USB4YesNo
USB-C ports2—
USB-A ports3—
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoYes
Ethernet5 Gbit/s5 Gbit/s
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerNoYes
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth5.45
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYes—
Numeric keypadNo—
Key travel1.7 mm—
Webcam1,080p1,080p
IR camera (face login)Yes—
Fingerprint readerNo—
Audio
Speakers4 speakers2 speakers
Dolby AtmosYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare