- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (9) and where ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Graphics9.1
9.2Overall performance9.0
7.9Display9.6
8.6Memory & storage5.3
5.0Battery & portability3.1
8.5Features & cooling9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 268 mm | +7.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 354 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 31 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Weight2.66 kg vs 2.8 kg+5%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Thickness26.8 mm vs 31 mm+16%
- Key travel2 mm vs 1.7 mm+18%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
- Fan noise (max. load)54 dB vs 57.2 dB+6%
Why is ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Brightness400 nits vs 1,200 nits3×
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 175 W+25%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 240 Hz+33%
- GPU compute (FP32)31.2 TFLOPS vs 37.4 TFLOPS+20%
- HDRNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- CPU cores20 vs 24+20%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 2,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 31.2 TFLOPS | 37.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 20,231 | 20,161 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 18,758 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,042 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,855 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 1,200 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 380 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.66 kg | 2.8 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 31 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 268 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 57.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.19.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5060 (2025)9.19.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsThunderobot Radiant S16 RTX 5060 (2025)9.19.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)9.18.9