NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)

What ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (2) and where Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022) wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
9.1Score
2 advantages≈ $5,100
Higher score
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)
8.4Score
8 advantages≈ $4,900
5.3Memory & storage7.1
3.1Battery & portability8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)
354 × 26831395 × 26226
ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)Difference
Depth268 mm262 mm+6 mm
Width354 mm395 mm−41 mm
Thickness31 mm26 mm+5 mm
Weight2.8 kg2.3 kg+0.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022)?

  1. CPU cores24 vs 14+71%
  2. Max CPU clock5.4 GHz vs 5 GHz+8%

Why is Erazer Beast X30 RTX 3080 Ti (2022) better than ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?

  1. RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
  2. Video memory12 GB vs 64 GB5.3×
  3. Weight2.8 kg vs 2.3 kg+22%
  4. GPU shader cores5,888 vs 7,424+26%
  5. RAM (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
  6. SD card readerNo · ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
  7. Thickness31 mm vs 26 mm+19%
  8. Screen size16″ vs 17.3″+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5070 Ti LaptopGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)175 W—
Video memory12 GB64 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7—
GPU shader cores5,8887,424
GPU compute (FP32)37.4 TFLOPS—
3DMark Steel Nomad Light20,161—
Processor
ProcessorCore Ultra 9 275HXCore i9-12900HK
CPU makerIntelIntel
CPU cores2414
Max CPU clock5.4 GHz5 GHz
Processor optionsCore Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX—
Display
Screen size16″17.3″
Resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1440
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate240 Hz—
Panel typeMini-LED—
Brightness1,200 nits—
sRGB coverage100%—
Response time3 ms—
DCI-P3 coverage100%—
Pixel density189 ppi—
Aspect ratio16:1016:9
G-Sync / FreeSyncYes—
Advanced OptimusNo—
MUX switchYes—
HDRYes—
TouchscreenNo—
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB64 GB
RAM (base)32 GB64 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed5,600 MHz—
Max. supported RAM64 GB—
RAM slots2—
Upgradable RAMYes—
SSD (up to)2,000 GB2,000 GB
SSD (base)2,000 GB2,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots2—
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4—
Battery & power
Battery capacity90 Wh91 Wh
Power adapter380 W—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)Yes—
USB-C charging power100 W—
Design & cooling
Weight2.8 kg2.3 kg
Thickness31 mm26 mm
Width354 mm395 mm
Depth268 mm262 mm
Body materialAluminium, Plastic—
ColoursBlackBlack
Cooling fans3—
Vapor chamber coolingYes—
Liquid metal (CPU)No—
Fan noise (max. load)57.2 dB—
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 5Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4YesYes
USB-C ports2—
USB-A ports3—
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNo—
Ethernet5 Gbit/s—
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerNoYes
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth5.4—
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYes—
Numeric keypadNo—
Key travel1.7 mm—
Webcam1,080p—
IR camera (face login)Yes—
Fingerprint readerNo—
Audio
Speakers4 speakers2 speakers
Dolby AtmosYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare