Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (3) and where ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Graphics9.1
8.0Overall performance9.2
8.9Display9.5
5.0Memory & storage5.2
5.8Battery & portability9.0
3.6Features & cooling9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) | ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 243 mm | 246 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 354 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 19 mm | 17 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- GPU power (TGP)120 W vs 115 W+4%
- Upgradable RAMYes · ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Fan noise (max. load)50.2 dB vs 68 dB+35%
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,860 vs 20,115+56%
- Panel typeMini-LED vs OLED
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- GPU compute (FP32)20 TFLOPS vs 26.8 TFLOPS+34%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Weight2.1 kg vs 1.95 kg+8%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 5,888+28%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 120 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 20 TFLOPS | 26.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,860 | 20,115 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900H | Core Ultra 9 285H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900H | Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 9 285H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 15,180 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,693 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 735 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 97% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 7,467 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.95 kg |
| Thickness | 19 mm | 17 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 243 mm | 246 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 50.2 dB | 68 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.0 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAlienware X16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.1vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.3vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsMSI Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023)7.97.6vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsSamsung Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.5vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsRazer Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2023)7.97.8vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Slim 7i Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)7.97.9