Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) vs MSI Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023)
What ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (22) and where Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Graphics7.1
8.0Overall performance6.8
8.9Display4.1
4.9Memory & storage8.1
5.7Battery & portability8.3
3.6Features & cooling6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023)
| ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) | Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 243 mm | 259.7 mm | −16.7 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 355.8 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 19 mm | 19.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel typeMini-LED vs IPS
- GPU power (TGP)120 W vs 105 W+14%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core15,180 vs 12,179+25%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,860 vs 11,579+11%
- GPU compute (FP32)20 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS+10%
- CPU cores14 vs 10+40%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023): No
- HDRYes · Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023): No
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023): No
Why is Stealth 16 Studio RTX 4070 (2023) better than ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 100 Wh+11%
- Weight2.1 kg vs 1.99 kg+6%
- HDMI 2.1No · ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core735 vs 807+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,200 MHz+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 120 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 20 TFLOPS | 18.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,860 | 11,579 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900H | Core i7-13620H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 10 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900H | Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13700H, Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 15,180 | 12,179 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,693 | 2,467 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 735 | 807 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 97% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 240 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.99 kg |
| Thickness | 19 mm | 19.9 mm |
| Width | 355 mm | 355.8 mm |
| Depth | 243 mm | 259.7 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | White, Blue |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 50.2 dB | 51.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.0 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | No | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.7 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.3vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsSamsung Galaxy Book 4 Ultra RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.4vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Slim 7i Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)7.97.8vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsRazer Blade 14 RTX 4070 (2023)7.97.8vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAlienware X16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.0vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsRazer Blade 15 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.1