vs
5.7Display9.7
6.3Memory & storage2.6
8.3Battery & portability3.7
6.8Features & cooling7.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
15 RTX 4050 (2026)Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)
| 15 RTX 4050 (2026) | Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 250.3 mm | 269 mm | −18.7 mm |
| Width | 349.5 mm | 358 mm | −8.5 mm |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 26 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.5 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 15 RTX 4050 (2026) better than Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026): No
- Weight2.2 kg vs 2.48 kg+13%
- Thickness22.9 mm vs 26 mm+14%
Why is Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026) better than 15 RTX 4050 (2026)?
- Video memory6 GB vs 24 GB4×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 10,4964.1×
- CPU cores8 vs 243×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Brightness300 nits vs 400 nits+33%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 6+15%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.5 GHz+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 8.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 6,011 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core 5 210H, Ryzen 5 220, Core 7 240H, Ryzen 7 260 | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,044 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,460 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 583 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.3″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 62% | — |
| Response time | 25 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 39% | — |
| Pixel density | 148 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 70 Wh | 70 Wh |
| Power adapter | 180 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 2.48 kg |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 349.5 mm | 358 mm |
| Depth | 250.3 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 53.4 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 6 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)vsAlienware 15 RTX 4050 (2026)5.55.6vs
Alienware 15 RTX 4050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5070 (2026)5.65.5vs
Alienware 15 RTX 4050 (2026)vsHP Omen 15 RTX 5050 (2026)5.65.9vs
Alienware 15 RTX 4050 (2026)vsGigabyte Eagle GL6J RTX 4050 (2026)5.66.0
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.37.1
vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.17.1