Acer Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023) vs Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023) does better (13) and where ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (24) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Graphics8.0
5.5Overall performance8.0
3.6Display8.9
3.3Memory & storage4.9
8.5Battery & portability5.7
4.2Features & cooling3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023)ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023) | ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 228.1 mm | 243 mm | −14.9 mm |
| Width | 322.8 mm | 355 mm | −32.2 mm |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 19 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 2.1 kg | −0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023) better than ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Weight1.55 kg vs 2.1 kg+35%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core967 vs 735+32%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- HDMI 2.1Yes · ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- CPU cores16 vs 14+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Thickness17.9 mm vs 19 mm+6%
- SSD (up to)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 4,800 MHz+33%
- Pixel density208 ppi vs 189 ppi+10%
Why is ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)9 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS2.2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,145 vs 12,860+80%
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,368 vs 15,180+23%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 4,608+50%
- Cooling fans1 vs 33×
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncNo · Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- HDRNo · Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 120 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 9 TFLOPS | 20 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,145 | 12,860 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i9-13900H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 22 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500H, Core i7-13700H, Core Ultra 7 155H | Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,368 | 15,180 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,403 | 2,693 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 967 | 735 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14.5″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 98% | 100% |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 83% | 97% |
| Pixel density | 208 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | No | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 100 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.55 kg | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 19 mm |
| Width | 322.8 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 228.1 mm | 243 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 1 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52.2 dB | 50.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.0 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023)vsMSI Creator Z17 A13 RTX 4060 (2023)5.14.8vs
Acer Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Slim 7 Gen 8 AMD RX 6800S (2023)5.15.2vs
Acer Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Flow X13 RTX 4050 (2023)5.14.9vs
Acer Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus Vivobook Pro 16 K6602 RTX 4060 (2023)5.14.8vs
Acer Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED K6502 RTX 4060 (2023)5.15.0vs
Acer Swift X SFX14-72G RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 RTX 3050 (2023)5.15.0