Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs MSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024)
What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (6) and where Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Memory & storage3.5
9.3Battery & portability6.5
8.4Features & cooling3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024)
| Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) | Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 250 mm | 250 mm | = |
| Width | 356 mm | 359 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 21 mm | 23 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 54 Wh+42%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024): No
- SD card readerYes · Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024): No
- Thickness21 mm vs 23 mm+10%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%
Why is Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Resolution classHD (768p/900p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Weight2.1 kg vs 1.98 kg+6%
- CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
- Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 45 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 8.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 6,476 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 5 125H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | — | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 12,885 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,507 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 1,002 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1600 × 900 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | HD (768p/900p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Pixel density | — | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | No |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 120 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.98 kg |
| Thickness | 21 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 356 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| Body material | — | Plastic |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 1 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | — | 1 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | No |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
MSI Sword 17 HX RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)6.56.6
vs
Gigabyte G5 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)6.76.6
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)6.46.6
vs
Gigabyte G6X RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)6.56.6
vs
Gigabyte G6 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)6.66.6
vs
MSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)6.56.6

